4.7 Article

Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms

期刊

BLOOD
卷 140, 期 21, 页码 2193-2227

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022015854

关键词

-

资金

  1. Celgene and Pfizer
  2. Roche and Takeda
  3. ADC Therapeutics
  4. Affimed
  5. Celgene
  6. Crispr Therapeutics
  7. Daiichi Sankyo
  8. Kyowa Hakko Kirin
  9. Millennium/Takeda
  10. Seattle Genetics
  11. Verastem/SecuraBio
  12. AstraZeneca
  13. Epizyme
  14. Janssen
  15. BeiGene
  16. BMS
  17. Trillium Therapeutics
  18. Eli Lilly
  19. Pharmacyclics
  20. X4 Pharmaceuticals
  21. Genentech/Roche
  22. MEIPharma
  23. Stemline
  24. Innate Pharma
  25. Alderan
  26. Sanofi
  27. Inatherys
  28. Virtuoso
  29. Asahi Kasei Pharma
  30. Chugai Pharmaceutical
  31. Chordia Therapeutics
  32. Eisai
  33. Kyowa Kirin
  34. Japan Blood Products Organization
  35. Boryong
  36. Merck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. However, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper discusses how established and newly developed molecular testing technologies complement clinical diagnoses and contribute to refining diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy prediction for lymphoid neoplasms. Future methods such as whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling are likely to become important tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for lymphoid malignancies.
With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据