4.8 Article

2D mesoporous silica-confined CsPbBr3 nanocrystals and N-doped graphene quantum dot: A self-enhanced quaternary composite structures for electrochemiluminescence analysis

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114664

关键词

Self-enhanced electrochemiluminescence; Perovskite nanocrystals; Nitrogen doped graphene quantum dot; 2D mesoporousSiO(2) nanosheets; Ochratoxin A detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21904055]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Fujian province [2020J05164]
  3. Education -Science Research Project for Young and Middle-aged Teachers of Fujian [JAT210282]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a self-enhanced superstructure was constructed to improve the stability and charge transfer efficiency of lead halide perovskites. A new ECL sensor with high affinity for OTA detection was developed.
Lead halide perovskites have become a potential candidate as electrochemiluminescence (ECL) emitters owing to their appealing electronic-to-optical merits. It remains extremely challenging, however, to improve stability and enhance charge transfer. Herein, a self-enhanced superstructures was constructed by successively loading N -doped graphene quantum dot (NGQDs) and CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) onto graphene supported two-dimensional mesoporous SiO2 nanosheets (2D mSiO(2)-G). This special architecture ensures improved stability and accelerated charge transport, leading to efficient self-enhanced ECL between NGQDs and PNCs in a confined mesoporous structure. Additionally, using molecular imprinting (MIP) as a protective barrier, an ECL sensor with high affinity for Ochratoxin A (OTA) detection was developed, which expressed the widest linear range of 10(-5 )ng/mL to 1.0 ng/mL and the lowest detection limit of 0.2 pg/mL. This work catches a glimpse of a new generation of desirable perovskite-based ECL emitters, which would be beneficial for its further application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据