4.8 Article

Low-condensed lignin and high-purity cellulose production from poplar by synergistic deep eutectic solvent-hydrogenolysis pretreatment

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127905

关键词

Ternary DES; Lignin; Less-condensed structure; Catalytic hydrogenolysis; High -purity cellulose

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a green and environmentally friendly method to obtain lignin with a structure similar to milled wood lignin (MWL) and high-purity cellulose from biomass. This is achieved through a two-step process: pretreatment with a ternary deep eutectic solvent (DES) to obtain lignin with a less-condensed structure, and catalytic hydrogenolysis to obtain high-purity cellulose. The results show that this method is effective in separating biomass and can significantly increase the yield of glucose after enzymatic hydrolysis.
This paper presented a green and environmentally friendly method to obtain lignin with a structure similar to milled wood lignin (MWL) and high-purity cellulose from biomass in a two-step process. The first step, maleic acid (MA), choline chloride (ChCl), and ethylene glycol (EG) ternary deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatment was performed to obtain lignin with less-condensed structure. The results showed that the obtained lignin had similar properties to MWL under the condition (MA/ChCl/EG = 1:5:15, 80?, 10 h). The DES recovered still had good cycle performance. The second step, the cellulose-rich residue was hydrogenated with isopropanol-water solvent and Raney nickel to obtain high-purity cellulose. The results showed that the purity of cellulose obtained by catalytic hydrogenolysis was > 94%. The glucose yield after enzymatic hydrolysis was 243.72 mg/g, which was 14.7 times higher than the untreated poplar. Overall, this work was of great significance for the effective separation of biomass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据