4.8 Article

Stable nitrogen removal in the novel continuous flow anammox system under deteriorated partial nitrification: Significance and superiority of the anaerobic-oxic-anoxic-oxic operation mode

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127693

关键词

Deteriorated partial nitrification; Mainstream anammox; Nitrogen removal; Partial denitrification coupling anammox

资金

  1. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [52131004]
  2. Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (111 Project) [D16003]
  3. Funding Projects of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a novel continuous push-flow anaerobic-oxic-anoxic-oxic (AOAO) process to rapidly restore nitrogen elimination performance under deteriorated partial nitrification. The study also found that endogenous partial denitrification coupled with anammox in the anoxic zone is crucial for maintaining stable nitrogen removal.
The collapse of mainstream anammox system caused by deterioration of partial nitrification (PN) is easy to occur and it is vital to quickly restore the stable nitrogen elimination performance. Herein, a novel continuous push-flow anaerobic-oxic-anoxic-oxic (AOAO) process treating sewage was used to restore the nitrogen elimination performance rapidly under deteriorated PN. The increased abundances of Nitrospira and Candidatus Nitrotoga was responsible for the deterioration of PN. Effluent total inorganic nitrogen of 8.7 mg N/L and a stable nitrogen removal rate of 0.083 kg N/m(3).d were obtained with the aerobic hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 3.75 h even PN deteriorated. Endogenous partial denitrification coupled anammox in the anoxic zone was essential to maintain stable nitrogen removal under the deterioration of PN and the anammox contribution increased from 17.2 % to 23.6 %. The AOAO system shows robustness on nitrogen removal even PN deteriorated under the decrease of HRT from 16 to 12 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据