4.8 Article

Nitrogen removal from low COD/N interflow using a hybrid activated sludge membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (H-MABR)

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127855

关键词

Hybrid activated sludge membrane -aerated; biofilm reactor; Interflow; Low COD/N ratio; Nitrogen removal; Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2019YFD1100503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid activated sludge membrane-aerated biofilm reactor based on a two-stage simultaneous nitrification-denitrification (SND) process was successfully utilized for treating interflow with low COD/N ratio. The reactor showed stable operation and high removal efficiency for COD, TN, and ammonia nitrogen under low COD/N conditions. Additionally, aerobic denitrification was found to play an important role in the denitrification process under aerobic conditions.
A hybrid activated sludge membrane-aerated biofilm reactor based on a two-stage simultaneous nitrification-denitrification (SND) process was built, and its utility for treating interflow with low chemical oxygen demand (COD)/total nitrogen (TN) (COD/N) was explored. The operating performance, functional microbial communities, and functional genes for nitrogen metabolism were evaluated at low COD/N (4-1.3). The reactor could achieve stable operation at COD/N = 4-1.5, and the removal efficiency of COD, TN, and ammonia nitrogen was stable at 90.30 +/- 2.36 %, 85.69 +/- 2.22 %, and 89.52 +/- 6.06 %, respectively. The SND rates were 70.89 % and 50.75 % when influent COD/N was 2.0 and 1.7, respectively, indicating that SND makes an important contribution to nitrogen removal under these two COD/N conditions. Microbial analysis revealed that the sampling sites with a high abundance of denitrification genes in the outer ring experienced aerobic conditions, inferring that aerobic denitrification also plays an important role in denitrification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据