4.8 Article

Performance and mechanism of tetracycline removal by the aerobic nitrate-reducing strain Pseudomonas sp. XS-18 with auto-aggregation

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 359, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127442

关键词

Aerobic nitrate reduction; Tetracycline removal; Extracellular polymeric substances; Auto -aggregation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2018YFD0800105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coexistence of multiple pollutants is a distinct feature of water pollution. This study analyzed the efficiency of strain XS-18 in removing nitrate and tetracycline (TC) and investigated the mechanism of TC tolerance and removal. The findings showed that XS-18 could efficiently remove TC through extracellular polymeric substance and cell surface adsorption, and its auto-aggregation ability could be improved by the secretion of polysaccharides and hydrophobic proteins stimulated by TC.
The coexistence of multiple pollutants has become a distinctive feature of water pollution. However, there are a few strains that can remove nitrate and tetracycline (TC). Here, the efficiency of strain XS-18 in removing nitrate and TC was analyzed, and the mechanism of tolerance and removal of TC was investigated by infrared spec-troscopy, three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy, and genome analysis. XS-18 could efficiently remove TC (0.40 mg.L-1.h(-1)) at pH 7.0-11.0 with auto-aggregation. TC was removed via extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) (55.90%) and cell surface (44.10%) adsorption. TC (10 mg/L) could stimulate XS-18 to secrete more polysaccharides and hydrophobic proteins to improve its auto-aggregation ability. The findings also confirmed that TC resistance genes were present. Furthermore, the bacterial flagellum, signal transduction of the chemo-tactic system and regulatory genes were shown to be related to the auto-aggregation of the strain. XS-18 has potential applications in the treatment of wastewater containing nitrate and TC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据