4.8 Article

Denitrification performance, bioelectricity generation and microbial response in microbial fuel cell-constructed wetland treating carbon constraint wastewater

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127902

关键词

Microbial fuel cell -constructed wetland; Denitrification; Bioelectricity generation; Microbial community; Nitrogen transformation pathway

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Support Program [2015BAL02B04]
  2. National First-class Disciplines (PNFD)
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_0864]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microbial fuel cell-constructed wetland (MFC-CW) is effective for nitrogen removal in carbon constraint wastewater treatment. Wetland plants contribute to denitrification, and the bioenergy output is linearly related to influent COD. Key functional genera play a crucial role in nitrogen removal.
For the deep reduction of nitrogen, the microbial fuel cell-constructed wetland (MFC-CW) was conducted for treating carbon constraint wastewater. Results indicated that nitrogen removal decreased from 94.96% to 24.96% with influent COD/TN (chemical oxygen demand/total nitrogen) from 4 to 0. MFC-CW was seriously affected by low organic wastewater. Wetland plants contributed to denitrification, with TN removal increasing from 46.13% to 64.87%. The bioenergy output showed a linear relationship with influent COD, and the maximum power density of 1.17 mW/m2 was obtained. Correlation analysis indicated that functional genera of Paenibacillus, Trichococcus, norank_KD4-96, norank_OLB14 played a crucial role in nitrogen removal. Influent COD and wetland plants affected carbon and nitrogen metabolisms, and key genes related to denitrification were more abundant in the cathode. Findings illustrated the nitrogen metabolism in MFC-CW with carbon constraint wastewater and will extend the application of MFC-CW in secondary effluent treatment from wastewater treatment plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据