4.7 Article

GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center of Information Technology of the University of Groningen
  2. NWO [184.034.019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the statistical properties of partial correlations obtained using shrinkage methods and proposes a new (parametric) approach to address bias in network analysis. These methods account for the number of variables, sample size, and shrinkage values, and perform better than alternative methods in balancing true positives and false positives. The effectiveness of these methods is demonstrated through simulations and gene expression datasets.
Motivation: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from geneexpression profiles. However, it is often ignored that the partial correlations are 'shrunk' and that they cannot be compared/assessed directly. Therefore, accurate (differential) network analyses need to account for the number of variables, the sample size, and also the shrinkage value, otherwise, the analysis and its biological interpretation would turn biased. To date, there are no appropriate methods to account for these factors and address these issues. Results: We derive the statistical properties of the partial correlation obtained with the Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage. Our result provides a toolbox for (differential) network analyses as (i) confidence intervals, (ii) a test for zero partial correlation (null-effects) and (iii) a test to compare partial correlations. Our novel (parametric) methods account for the number of variables, the sample size and the shrinkage values. Additionally, they are computationally fast, simple to implement and require only basic statistical knowledge. Our simulations show that the novel tests perform better than DiffNetFDR-a recently published alternative-in terms of the trade-off between true and false positives. The methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and two gene-expression datasets from Escherichia coli and Mus musculus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据