4.7 Article

Novel nanocomposite of spiky-shaped gold nanourchins/titanium dioxide/nafion for amplified signal and efficient electrochemiluminescence detection of ovomucoid

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108172

关键词

Ovomucoid; Electrochemiluminescence; Immunosensor; Titanium dioxide; Gold nanourchins

资金

  1. Universiti Brunei Darussalam [UBD/RSCH/1.4/FICBF(b)/2018/010]
  2. Brunei Research Council
  3. Ministry of Education of Brunei Darussalam
  4. Universiti Teknologi Brunei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the development of an electrochemiluminescence immunosensor using a novel nanostructured composite of titanium dioxide and gold nanourchins for the detection of protein allergen Ovomucoid found in eggs. The sensor exhibited a low limit of detection, wide linear range, and excellent selectivity, reproducibility, and recovery rates in real food samples.
This work reports on the first electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunosensor employing a novel nanostructured composite of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and gold nanourchins (AuNU) to detect protein allergen Ovomucoid (Ovm) found in eggs. TiO2 and AuNU were dispersed in Nafion and drop-casted onto SPGE with Tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)-ruthenium (II) ([Ru(bpy)(3)](2+)) and tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) served as strong luminophore/co-reactant pairs as a source of ECL signals. The linear range, limit of detection, reproducibility and practical applications of the sensor were assessed. The fabricated ECL immuosensor produced a promising limit of detection of as low as 0.01 pg/mL. Two linear ranges of 0.01-50 pg/mL and 100-750 pg/mL with corresponding correlation coefficients of R-2 = 0.99136 and R-2 = 0.97829) respectively, were determined. Despite its simple fabrication method, this label-free immunosensor also showcased excellent selectivity, reproducibility, interference-resistance and yielded outstanding recoveries between 97.42 and 104.05% of Ovm analysis in spiked real food samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据