4.7 Review

Sex bias and omission exists in Batten disease research: Systematic review of the use of animal disease models

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166489

关键词

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis; Animal; Mouse; Sex

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/R025134]
  2. University College London
  3. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
  4. MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology University Unit at UCL [MC_U12266B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Batten disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that mainly affects children, and there is a lack of consideration for sex differences in research using animal models. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of considering sex as a biological variable, and recommendations have been made to address this issue.
Batten disease, also known as the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL), is a group of inherited neurodegenerative disorders mainly affecting children. NCL are characterised by seizures, loss of vision, and progressive motor and cognitive decline, and are the most common form of childhood dementia. At least one type of Batten disease and three types of mouse disease models show sex differences in their severity and progression. Scientific research has a recognised prevalent omission of female animals when using model organisms for basic and preclinical research. Sex bias and omission in research using animal models of Batten disease may affect understanding and treatment development. We conducted a systematic review of research publications since the first identification of NCL genes in 1995, identifying those using animal models. We found that <10 % of these papers considered sex as a biological variable. There was consistent omission of female model organisms in studies. This varied over the period but is improving; one third of papers considered sex as a biological variable in the last decade, and there is a noticeable increase in the last 5 years. The wide-ranging reasons for this published sex bias are discussed, including misunderstanding regarding oestrogen, impact on sample size, and the underrepresentation of female scientists. Their implications for Batten disease and future research are considered. Recommendations going forward support requirements by funders for consideration of sex in all stages of experimental design and implementation, and a role for publishers, families and others with a particular interest in Batten disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据