4.6 Article

Enhancement of anaerobic digestion performance of corn straw via combined sodium hydroxide-cellulase pretreatment

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108652

关键词

NaOH; Cellulase; Corn straw; Anaerobic digestion

资金

  1. Shenzhen Polytechnic [6020320003k]
  2. Department of education of Guangdong Province [2019GGCZX007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, NaOH-cellulase pretreatment was used to effectively improve the anaerobic digestion (AD) of corn straw. The optimal conditions for NaOH-cellulase pretreatment were found to be 6.0% NaOH concentration and 0.10 g.g(-1) dry matter cellulase. NaOH-cellulase pretreatment significantly increased methane production and straw degradation rate.
Effective pretreatment of corn straw is essential to improve its anaerobic digestion (AD), NaOH-cellulase pretreatment of corn straw may be effective in enhancing its AD at the theoretical level. In this study, the effects of NaOH-cellulase treatment on corn straw degradation rate and sugar yield were investigated. Moreover, the microstructure analysis of corn straw was performed to determine the treatment mechanism. Gas production, methane content, kinetic fitting, and stability of AD of corn straw were compared before and after pretreatment to determine the efficacy of NaOH-cellulase pretreatment. The results showed the highest straw degradation rate (230% higher than that of the control group) when hydrolyzed by 6.0% of NaOH as 0.10 g.g(-1) dry matter cellulase, and the biomethane content in corn straw pretreated with 6.0% of NaOH-elution-cellulase reached 70.1%. The biomethane yields of the corn straw after NaOH-elution-enzymatic hydrolysis using 4% of NaOH was 317 +/- 11 mL.g(-1) VS. The efficiency of AD after 4.0% of NaOH pretreatment was better than that after 6.0%-NaOH pretreatment, where the anaerobic system was more stable. In this study, NaOH-cellulase was used for the first time to pretreat corn straw, which effectively improved its AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据