4.6 Article

Constitutive activation of estrogen receptor ? signaling in muscle prolongs exercise endurance in mice

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.08.064

关键词

Estrogen receptor; Endurance; Muscle; Gene expression; Mouse

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan [20K08916, 20K21636, 20H03734, 21H04829, 20K21667]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Vehicle Racing Commemorative Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen signaling potentiates exercise endurance in skeletal muscle through modulating the expression of metabolism-associated genes.
Estrogen is a female hormone that plays a role in various tissues, although the mechanism in skeletal muscle has not been fully clarified. We previously showed that systemic administration of estrogen for 10 weeks ameliorated decreased exercise endurance in ovariectomized mice. To assess whether a long-term and muscle-specific activation of estrogen signaling modulates muscle function, we constructed an expression plasmid for a constitutively active estrogen receptor a (caERa) under the control of muscle creatine kinase (Mck) gene promoter/enhancer. In C2C12 mouse myoblastic cells, transfection of the Mck- caERa plasmid elevated the estrogen response element-driven transcription in a ligand-independent manner. Using this construct, we generated Mck-caERa transgenic mice, in which caERa is predomi-nantly expressed in muscle. Treadmill running test revealed that female Mck-caERa mice exhibit a prolonged running time and distance compared with the wild-type mice. Moreover, microarray expression analysis revealed that the genes related to lipid metabolism, insulin signaling, and growth factor signaling were particularly upregulated in the quadriceps femoris muscle of Mck-caERa mice. These results suggest that estrogen signaling potentiates exercise endurance in skeletal muscle through modulating the expression of metabolism-associated genes. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据