4.6 Article

Brown dwarf companions in microlensing binaries detected during the 2016-2018 seasons

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 667, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244186

关键词

gravitational lensing: micro; brown dwarfs

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A4A2002885, 2019R1A2C2085965]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JSPS24253004, JSPS26247023, JSPS23340064, JSPS15H00781, JP16H06287, JP17H02871]
  3. NSF [AST-2108414]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [12133005]
  5. Research fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to find microlensing binaries containing brown dwarf companions. We identified six binary systems with candidate BD companions by modeling lensing events with anomaly features in their light curves.
Aims. With the aim of finding microlensing binaries containing brown dwarf (BD) companions, we investigate the microlensing survey data collected during the 2016-2018 seasons. Methods. For this purpose, we first modeled lensing events with light curves exhibiting anomaly features that are likely to be produced by binary lenses. We then sorted out BD companion binary-lens events by applying the criterion that the companion-to-primary mass ratio is q less than or similar to 0.1. With this procedure, we identify six binaries with candidate BD companions: OGLE-2016-BLG-0890L, MOA-2017-BLG-477L, OGLE-2017-BLG-0614L, KMT-2018-BLG-0357L, OGLE-2018-BLG-1489L, and OGLE-2018-BLG-0360L. Results. We estimated the masses of the binary companions by conducting Bayesian analyses using the observables of the individual lensing events. According to the Bayesian estimation of the lens masses, the probabilities for the lens companions of the events OGLE-2016-BLG-0890, OGLE-2017-BLG-0614, OGLE-2018-BLG-1489, and OGLE-2018-BLG-0360 to be in the BD mass regime are very high with P-BD > 80%. For MOA-2017-BLG-477 and KMT-2018-BLG-0357, the probabilities are relatively low with P-BD = 61% and 69%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据