4.0 Article

Cognitive impairment and elevated peripheral cytokines in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

期刊

ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA
卷 80, 期 8, 页码 786-793

出版社

ASSOC ARQUIVOS NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755234

关键词

Cognitive Dysfunction; Mental Status and Dementia; Tests; Breast Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Cytokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study observed the effects of FAC, CEF, and CMF chemotherapy regimens on cognition and circulating proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β in breast cancer patients. The results showed that anthracycline-based regimen increased IL-6 and IL-1β levels and caused more decline in cognition compared to non-anthracycline-based regimens.
Background Anthracyclines-based regimen (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC); cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil [CEF]) and non-anthracycline based regimens (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF]) are widely used as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients. Objective The present study was conducted to observe the effects of FAC, CEF, and CMF regimen on cognition and circulatory proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6 [IL-6] and interleukin 1 beta [IL-1 beta]) for the duration of three cycles of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed HER-2 negative breast cancer patients were enrolled and divided into 3 groups as FAC- ( n = 27), CEF- ( n = 26), and CMF- ( n = 27) receiving patients. Serum IL-6 and IL-1 beta levels were measured by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State examination (MMSE) questionnaire. Results Anthracycline-based regimen was found to increase the levels of IL-6, IL-1 beta, and decreased MMSE scores compared with CMF regimen ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Anthracycline-based regimen caused comparatively higher peripheral inflammation, which could be the reason for more decline in cognition in anthracycline-receiving patients than non-anthracycline group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据