4.5 Article

Drag exerted by a micropolar fluid on a dense swarm of permeable spherical particles

期刊

ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS
卷 92, 期 11, 页码 3417-3431

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-022-02244-9

关键词

Micropolar fluid; Permeable surface; Cell model; Stream function; Drag force; Darcy law

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the slow steady axisymmetric flow of an incompressible non-Newtonian micropolar fluid around and through a swarm of permeable spherical particles in a cell using a cell model technique. Analytical solutions for the flow fields are obtained using the stream function solutions of Stokes equation. The numerical results show the pressure distribution, microrotation components, drag force, flow rate, and wall correction factor, and their variations with different fluid parameters are presented and discussed. The drag force, flow rate, and wall correction factor are found to be greater in the Kuwabara model compared to the Kvashnin model.
This work elucidates the slow steady axisymmetric flow of an incompressible non-Newtonian micropolar fluid around and through the swarm of permeable spherical particles in cell using cell model technique. The inner particle in the cell is assumed to be permeable and the outer to be fictitious. The stream function solutions of Stokes equation are obtained for the flow fields. The problem is solved analytically for two models: Kuwabara and Kvashnin. The numerical results for the pressure distribution, microrotation components, drag force experienced by each permeable sphere, flow rate through the permeable surface and wall correction factor are obtained explicitly for both model and their variation with respect to different fluid parameters are presented graphically and discussed. Some previous results for the drag force have been verified. We have concluded that drag force, flow rate and wall correction factor are greater for the case of Kuwabara as compared to Kvashnin cell model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据