4.7 Article

Design and analysis of LNG cold energy cascade utilization system integrating light hydrocarbon separation, organic Rankine cycle and direct cooling

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118672

关键词

LNG cold energy; Light hydrocarbon separation; Organic Rankine cycle; Direct cooling; Thermodynamic analysis; Economic analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel LNG cold energy cascade integrated utilization system is constructed in this paper, and the thermodynamic and economic analysis of the system is carried out. The system shows superior performance in both power output and revenue compared to the reference system.
To effectively recover the cold energy released in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification process, this paper constructs a novel LNG cold energy cascade integrated utilization system. In the system, the LNG cold energy in low temperature zone is used for light hydrocarbon separation (LHS), and the remaining cold energy is divided into two parts. One part is used for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as well as data center cooling (DCC), and the other part is used for cold warehouse cooling (CWC). The thermodynamic and economic analysis of the system is carried out in detail, and the multi-objective optimization based on NSGA-II is implemented to investigate the optimal performance. The results show that the net power output of the system is 4259.72 kW, much larger than that of the LNG cold energy single utilization system for LHS in reference, and the cold energy for data center and cold warehouse is equivalent to saving 12685.87 kW electric energy. Furthermore, the revenue of the system in 20 years is 2.9982 x 10(9) $, more than that of the reference system. Through the net present value analysis, it is found that the system is more sensitive to the ethane price than to electric price.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据