4.7 Review

Review of surface modification in pool boiling application: Coating manufacturing process and heat transfer enhancement mechanism

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119041

关键词

Boiling; Surface Modification Methods; Coating Manufacturing Process; Critical Heat Flux; Heat Transfer Coefficient

资金

  1. Project of support program for outstanding young people in Colleges and Universities [gxyqZD201830]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2008085J25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the surface modification technology in boiling heat transfer, including physical and chemical methods. It also summarizes the common boiling strengthening mechanisms and provides CHF prediction models for nanostructured coatings.
With the development of science and technology, the operating power of equipment is getting higher and higher, and the demand for heat dissipation is also increasing. Therefore, thermal management has become a hot topic in recent years. Boiling heat transfer has been considered as a effective solution for heat dissipation. The effect of boiling heat transfer can be enhanced by increasing the surface microstructure and nanocoating. This is the so-called surface modification technology. This paper divides the coating modification methods into two types: physical methods and chemical methods, for sorting and evaluation. For example, common physical methods include spin coating, magnetron sputtering, and chemical methods include chemical vapor deposition, electro-chemical cathode and anode methods. In addition, in order to better predict the heat transfer effects of different structures at different stages, this review summarizes the common boiling strengthening mechanisms, evaluates the surface modification methods applied to pool boiling. Finally, critical heat flux (CHF) prediction models that can be used for nanostructured coatings are summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据