4.7 Article

Active layer nitrogen doping technique with excellent thermal stability for resistive switching memristor

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 603, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154307

关键词

Memristor; Thermal stability; Resistive random access memory (RRAM); Oxygen vacancy; Post metal annealing; Nitrogen doping

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program within the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C2004029]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT for Original Technology Program [2020M3F3A2A01082329]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a thermally stable memristor with nitrogen-doped hafnium oxide as an active layer is proposed, which exhibits normal operation even under high temperature conditions.
In this study, we propose a thermally stable memristor with nitrogen-doped hafnium oxide (HfO:N)-based resistive switching (RS) memory. The memristor with HfO:N as an active layer showed only a 7% change in the resistance in the high resistance state (HRS) after post-metal annealing (PMA) at 400 & DEG;C for 1 h. In contrast, the HfO2-based memristor exhibited an 83% change in the resistance at HRS after PMA at 400 & DEG;C for 1 h and lost RS operating characteristics after PMA over 400 & DEG;C. In addition, although the resistance of the HRS decreased by 80% after PMA at 550 & DEG;C for 1 h, the HfO:N-based memristor showed that the RS operation was maintained up to 550 & DEG;C. Through the nitrogen doping technique, a thermal budget of 550 & DEG;C can be achieved, which is one of the highest thermal budgets in RS memory with PMA. Such thermal stability enhancement of the memristor is a result of nitrogen doping, which improves the structural stability of the active layer and suppresses the gener-ation of oxygen vacancies in the active layer. This experimental approach can facilitate the development of advanced memristor devices with a good thermal budget of up to 550 & DEG;C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据