4.7 Article

A practical regularity model based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109614

关键词

Multiobjective optimization; Evolutionary algorithm; Regularity model; Offspring generation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Com-mission of Shanghai Municipality, China [19511120601, 2018AAA0100902]
  2. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [61731009, 61907015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm (RM-MEDA) for multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). The authors empirically study and optimize the modeling and sampling components of RM-MEDA, resulting in improved performance. Experimental results demonstrate that the optimized algorithm outperforms five state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms on various benchmark problems.
It is well known that domain knowledge helps design efficient problem solvers. The regularity model based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm (RM-MEDA) is such a method that uses the regularity property of continuous multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). However, RM-MEDA may fail to work when dealing with complicated MOPs. This paper aims to propose some practical strategies to improve the performance of RM-MEDA. We empirically study the modeling and sampling components of RM-MEDA that influence its performance. After that, some new components, including the population partition, modeling, and offspring generation procedures, are designed and embedded in the regularity model. The experimental study suggests that the new components are more efficient than those in RM-MEDA when using the regularity model. The improved version has also been verified on various complicated benchmark problems, and the experimental results have shown that the new version outperforms five state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据