4.7 Review

Progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of microbial metal sulfide oxidation - part A

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 106, 期 21, 页码 6933-6952

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12168-7

关键词

Bioleaching; Acidithiobacillus; Metal sulfides; Extracellular polymeric substances; Biofilms

资金

  1. [ANID_Fondecyt 116007]
  2. [1190892]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes some recent discoveries related to bioleaching microorganisms, including phylogeny, chemical pathways, surface science, biochemistry, anaerobic metabolism, cell-cell communication, molecular biology, and biofilm lifestyle. These findings contribute to a better understanding of their lifestyle and may open up new possibilities for synthetic biology applications.
Bioleaching of metal sulfides is performed by diverse microorganisms. The dissolution of metal sulfides occurs via two chemical pathways, either the thiosulfate or the polysulfide pathway. These are determined by the metal sulfides' mineralogy and their acid solubility. The microbial cell enables metal sulfide dissolution via oxidation of iron(II) ions and inorganic sulfur compounds. Thereby, the metal sulfide attacking agents iron(III) ions and protons are generated. Cells are active either in a planktonic state or attached to the mineral surface, forming biofilms. This review, as an update of the previous one (Vera et al., 2013a), summarizes some recent discoveries relevant to bioleaching microorganisms, contributing to a better understanding of their lifestyle. These comprise phylogeny, chemical pathways, surface science, biochemistry of iron and sulfur metabolism, anaerobic metabolism, cell-cell communication, molecular biology, and biofilm lifestyle. Recent advances from genetic engineering applied to bioleaching microorganisms will allow in the future to better understand important aspects of their physiology, as well as to open new possibilities for synthetic biology applications of leaching microbial consortia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据