4.7 Article

A dynamic interplay between Allee effect and time delay in a mathematical model with weakening memory

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127306

关键词

Prey-predator dynamics; Chaos; Dynamical systems; Allee effect; Memory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the effects of constant time delays on a population dynamics model with Allee effect and weakening memory. Analytical and numerical analyses are conducted to study the role of delays in competition and cooperation. The results demonstrate that time delays can significantly impact the system behavior and offer important insights into underlying biological mechanisms.
This paper deals with a model of population dynamics comprising Allee effect and weakening memory with constant time delays. Since predator density depends on the prey density in current time and in past, a two-component model of prey-predator interactions is complemented with a third differential equation for the influence of recent past. The role of constant time delays incorporated in the functional form of Allee effect (referred as delays in competition and cooperation) is investigated analytically and numerically. Steady states of the model are obtained and the local stability analysis around the coexisting state is calculated in the presence of both delays. The critical threshold for time delays, above which the stability of the system switches from stable (unstable) to unstable (stable), is computed for various cases. Analytical findings of this paper are supported with numerical simulations, where time evolution as well as numerical bifurcation diagrams are presented. The results of this paper demonstrate that the influence of past on the prey-predator density in the present of time delay may have a considerable effect upon the system behaviour and can give important insights into underlying biological mechanism. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据