4.7 Article

Optimization of condition-based maintenance for multi-state deterioration systems under random shock

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 80-99

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2022.10.036

关键词

Multi-state deterioration; Random shock; Dependent failure processes; Condition-based inspection; Condition-based preventive maintenance; Multi-objective optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new condition-based maintenance policy for systems subject to multi-state deterioration and random shock simultaneously. The Semi-Markov process and compound Poisson process are used to model the failure processes and dependent relationships. A condition-based inspection policy is designed to capture the states where maintenance actions are needed. The optimal values of the proposed maintenance policy are obtained by Monte Carlo simulation technique.
This paper proposes a new condition-based maintenance policy for systems subject to multi-state deterioration and random shock simultaneously. Both Semi-Markov process and compound Poisson process are employed to explicitly model the exposed failure processes and dependent relationships between them. A condition-based inspection policy is de-signed to timely capture the states where maintenance actions are needed. The influence factors of preventive maintenance are specified as random shock and ageing process re-spectively. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is employed to obtain the optimal values about the proposed maintenance policy. An illustrate example about a power generator is taken into consideration to show how the newly developed maintenance policy works in real practice. The comparison analysis demonstrates that (1) the proposed condition-based inspection can effectively reveal the maintenance time points within limited inspection cost; (2) the new maintenance policy can achieve better objective values of availability and maintenance cost.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据