4.5 Article

A data-driven framework for assessing soldier performance, health, and survivability

期刊

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103809

关键词

Military; Pattern classification; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. Canadian Department of National Defence (DND) [W7719-195460/001/TOR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Presented in this study is a framework that uses pattern classification methods to incrementally morph whole-body movement patterns to investigate the impact of personal and load characteristics on survivability tradespace. The results reveal that personal characteristics have a significant impact on the tradespace when carrying heavy loads. Military leaders can make decisions based on objective information using this framework, thus improving operational readiness and mission success.
Presented is a framework that uses pattern classification methods to incrementally morph whole-body movement patterns to investigate how personal (sex, military experience, and body mass) and load characteristics affect the survivability tradespace: performance, musculoskeletal health, and susceptibility to enemy action. Sixteen civilians and 12 soldiers performed eight military-based movement patterns under three body-borne loads:-5.5 kg,-22 kg, and-38 kg. Our framework reduces dimensionality using principal component analysis and uses linear discriminant analysis to classify groups and morph movement patterns. Our framework produces morphed whole-body movement patterns that emulate previously published changes to the survivability tradespace caused by body-borne loads. Additionally, we identified that personal characteristics can greatly impact the tradespace when carrying heavy body-borne loads. Using our framework, military leaders can make decisions based on objective information for armour procurement, employment of armour, and battlefield performance, which can positively impact operational readiness and increase overall mission success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据