4.7 Article

Influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochars derived from municipal sewage sludge

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 417-426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.050

关键词

Sewage sludge biochar; Heavy metals; Thermal pyrolysis; BCR sequential extraction; Environmental risk assessment

资金

  1. Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Research Team of Zhejiang Province [2013TD12/12]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201229]
  3. Innovative Technology Commission of Hong Kong [ITS/174/14FX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dried raw sludge was pyrolyzed at temperatures ranging from 400 to 600 degrees C at the increase of 50 degrees C intervals to investigate the influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. The sludge biochar yield decreased significantly with increasing pyrolysis temperature but the pH, ash content and specific surface area increased. Conversion of sludge to biochar markedly decreased the WC and NIX ratios. FT-IR analysis confirmed a dramatic depletion of H and N and a higher degree of aromatic condensation in process of biochar formation at higher temperatures. The total concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cr, Mn, and Ni increased with conversion of sludge to biochar and increasing pyrolysis temperature. However, using BCR sequential extraction and analysis, it was found that most of the heavy metals existed in the oxizable and residual forms after pyrolysis, especially at 600 degrees C, resulting in a significant reduction in their bioavailability, leading to a very low environmental risk of the biochar. The present study indicates pyrolysis is a promising sludge treatment method for heavy metals immobilization in biochar, and highlights the potential to minimize the harmful effects of biochar by controlling pyrolysis temperature. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据