4.8 Article

Energy and water without carbon: Integrated desalination and nuclear power at Diablo Canyon

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119612

关键词

Desalination; Nuclear power; Techno-economic analysis; Reverse osmosis; Low-carbon

资金

  1. Rothrock Family Fund
  2. Data Collective Venture Capital (DCVC)
  3. MIT Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems (CANES)
  4. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR)
  5. MIT Abdul Latif Jameel Water and Food Systems Lab (J-WAFS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluates the feasibility of combining a large-scale seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination plant with an existing nuclear power plant. The research finds that this co-production arrangement has significant cost advantages and lower carbon emissions compared to standalone desalination plants.
A seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination plant collocated with an existing nuclear plant would have low electricity costs, could share the power plant's seawater intake and outfall, and would have zero carbon footprint during operation. Unlike thermal desalination technologies, electrically-driven SWRO is ideal for retrofitting existing power plants because the turbines and condensers would not need expensive modifications. Here, we evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of collocating a large-scale SWRO plant with an existing nuclear power plant, specifically the 2.2 GWe Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant on California's central coast. The seawater that cools the nuclear plant's condensers provides the feed water for desalination. The desalination brine is diluted with the remaining condenser coolant before being discharged to the ocean. A brushed-screen intake structure, serving both the nuclear power plant and the desalination plant, can comply with strict California regulations protecting marine organisms. This coproduction arrangement has a significant cost advantage relative to a stand-alone desalination plant. The levelized cost of water (LCOW) ranges from US$0.77 to US$0.98 per m(3) of fresh water, with water distribution to offtakers adding US$0.02 to US$0.21 per m(3) over 20-185 km. In comparison, California's largest desalination plant, in Carlsbad, has an LCOW of about US$1.84 per m(3). These cost savings result from reduced power costs (about US$0.054 per kWh) and from sharing some expensive infrastructure. Further, nuclear electricity allows a Carlsbad-size SWRO to avoid 47 kt/y of CO2 emissions relative to grid electricity. Examination of substantially larger desalination plants introduces additional considerations. This study is the first to show that collocated SWRO and nuclear power are strongly coupled and have a significant economic advantage over seawater desalination at other sites. These benefits should apply to dozens of existing nuclear power plants worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据