4.7 Review

Adsorption of organic water pollutants by clays and clay minerals composites: A comprehensive review

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2022.106686

关键词

Adsorption; Clay composites; Organic pollutants; Water pollutants; Adsorbents cost

资金

  1. Qatar National Research Fund [GSRA6-2-0516- 19029]
  2. Qatar National Library

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review assesses the application of clay and clay mineral composites in treating organic water pollutants and discusses the impact of the composites' physicochemical properties on their adsorption performance and regeneration methods. It also summarizes the current progress in this field and outlines future research directions.
Clays and clay minerals are inexpensive, non-toxic, and naturally occurring minerals that have been utilized in water remediation as adsorbents. However, clays and clay minerals and those modified with heat, surfactants, acids, or organic-inorganic modifiers exhibit low adsorption capacity and re-generation ability towards organic water pollutants. The development of clays and clay minerals composites has gained considerable attention in recent years due to their enhanced adsorption capacity, ease of recovery from aqueous solution and improved physiochemical properties relative to raw and modified clays and clay minerals. This review aims to assess recent literature on clays and clay minerals composites including bentonite, montmorillonite and kaolinite intercalated with carbonaceous, metals, metal oxides, chitosan and polymeric materials and appraise their adsorption performance towards organic water pollutants. The review examines the effect of the composites' physicochemical properties on the adsorption performance and evaluates the adsorption mechanism as well as regeneration methods. The review also attempts to highlight the current progress in this area by assessing the outcomes of recently published articles and outline the research gaps for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据