4.8 Article

Maximally exploiting active sites on Yolk@shell nanoreactor: Nearly 100% PMS activation efficiency and outstanding performance over full pH range in Fenton-like reaction

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121594

关键词

Yolk@shell nanoreactor; Fenton-like reaction; PMS activation; CoN 4 active sites; O-1(2)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21 674 028]
  2. HeilongJiang Postdoctoral Funds for Scientific Research Initiation [LBH-Q19169]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Heilongjiang Province Universities [KJCX201911]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a yolk@shell nanoreactor was designed with abundant hollow CoO nanoparticles and Co, N co-doped graphitized carbon as the shell. The nanoreactor achieved high activation efficiency and degradation performance in Fenton-like reaction, while reducing metal leaching and adapting to various environmental conditions.
In Fenton-like reaction, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) could be activated by either transition metals or graphitized carbon. These two activation paths had their own advantages and disadvantages. To simultaneously increase the PMS activation efficiency and degradation performance, lower the metal leaching, and improve the environmental adaption; herein, a yolk@shell nanoreactor was designed, where Kirkendall effect induced abundant hollow CoO nanoparticles were encapsulated inside a Co, N atoms co-doped graphitized carbon (Co-N-GC) shell. Because of the full exploitation of active sites on yolk@shell nanoreactor, nearly 100% of PMS activation efficiency was realized and 80.0% of tetracycline (TC) (50 mg/L) was degraded within 40 min. Under the protection of Co-N-GC shell, TC were effectively degraded over the full pH range or in the presence of various inorganic anions, and the leached Co2+ was only 0.462 mg/L even after 5 cycles. This study provided a new vision to improve the Fenton-like reaction using yolk@shell nanoreactor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据