4.8 Article

PDI bridged MIL-125(Ti)-NH2 heterojunction with frustrated Lewis pairs: A promising photocatalyst for Cr(VI) reduction and antibacterial application

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 317, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121798

关键词

MIL-125(Ti)-NH2; perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic diimid; Staphylococcus aureus; Frustrated Lewis pairs; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21806085, 22108129]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2019J01837]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningde Normal University [2020T01, 2019ZX410]
  4. Program of IRTSTFJ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by FLPs concept, an organic supramolecular bridged MOFs heterojunction was fabricated, showing enhanced photocatalytic activity for disinfection and Cr(VI) reduction.
Inspired by the concept of frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) from homogeneous catalysis, an organic supramolecular bridged metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) heterojunction, i.e., a perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic diimide@MIL-125(Ti)-NH2 (denoted PDI@MTi) composite is successfully fabricated via a two-step synthesis method. Experimental characterisations and theoretical calculations reveal that in the obtained TiO5 x-ligand-PDI FLPs, the unsaturated Ti-O clusters function as a Lewis acid to accept photogenerated electrons, and the PDI sites act as a Lewis base to capture photogenerated holes. With the unique structure characteristics, the PDI@MTi shows excellent photocatalytic activity toward the disinfection of Staphylococcus aureus and Cr(VI) reduction, with 1.0- and 10.3-fold enhancements, respectively, compared with unadorned MTi. The synergic effects of the micro polarisation field, multiple active sites, and a C-N bonded interface contributed to photoactivity enhancement. This work demonstrates the potential of using MTi as a platform for constructing FLPs-containing heterogeneous photocatalysts and provides new strategies to control carrier separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据