4.8 Article

Confining intermediates within a catalytic nanoreactor facilitates nitrate-to-ammonia electrosynthesis

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 315, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121548

关键词

Nitrate reduction; Ammonia synthesis; Nanoreactor; Copper oxide; Nanoconfinement

资金

  1. National Nature Foundation of China [81927809]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YJ2021151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work demonstrates the incorporation of CuOx active species into a TiO2 nanotube reactor for selective electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reactions. The diffusion of the intermediate NO2- is hindered due to the nanoconfined space, leading to a high faradaic efficiency and conversion rate of nitrate to ammonia. Theoretical insights further support the understanding of the surface and interface interactions.
Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reaction (NitRR) has gained attention because of its potential to mitigate environmental nitrogen pollution and recycle artificial nutrients. NitRR produces ammonia through complicated pathways that involve multistep electron transfer, while the formation of byproducts, e.g. toxic nitrite (NO2-), leads to lower energy efficiency and recontamination. In this work, we report the incorporation of CuOx active species into a TiO2-nanotube reactor (TiO2 NTs/CuOx) for the highly selective NitRR. In particular, the NO2- intermediate is diminished due to the hindered diffusion within the nanoconfined space. Thus, the CuOx modified nanoreactor performs a maximum faradaic efficiency of 92.23% and a yield rate of 1241.81 mu g h(-1) cm(-2) for nitrate-to-ammonia conversion. Theoretical insights further support a fundamental understanding of a cross scale interaction over the surface and interface. The findings suggest a promising approach for enhancing reaction activity and selectivity enabled by rationally designed active sites coupled with geometrically regulated structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据