4.8 Article

Hydrophobicity modulation on a ferriporphyrin-based metal-organic framework for enhanced ambient electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121673

关键词

Electrocatalysis; Nitrogen fixation; Hydrophobicity; Ferriporphyrin; Metal-organic framework

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U21A20286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores a molecular-level post-modification strategy to enhance the performance of electrocatalytic N-2 fixation by introducing alkyl chains of varying lengths in a metal-organic framework. The best results achieved were a Faradaic efficiency of 70.7% and a NO3- yield of 110.9 mu g h(-1) mg(cat).(-1).
Electrocatalytic N-2 fixation represents an energy-efficient and long-term sustainable approach, which can convert N-2 to NO3- or NH3 via the electrochemical N-2 oxidation reaction (NOR) or N-2 reduction reaction (NRR). However, the inert N-2 molecule, low activity of electrocatalysts, and predisposed competitive reactions result in the poor yields and Faradaic efficiencies of N-2 fixation reactions, which greatly restrict the application of such green synthesis technology. In this work, a molecular-level post-modification strategy has been explored to integrate diverse alkyl chains on a ferriporphyrin-based metal-organic framework (MOF) PCN-222(Fe), which provides adjustable hydrophobicity and highly dispersed active sites. The increased lengths of alkyl groups can gradually improve the hydrophobicity of decorated MOFs, which effectively suppress the competitive reactions and boost the electrocatalytic NOR and NRR performances. Significantly, the highest Faradaic efficiency of 70.7% so far and a state-of-the-art NO3- yield of 110.9 mu g h(-1) mg(cat).(-1) can be achieved for NOR, which are attributed to the synergistic effect of FeN4 active sites, high porosity, and strong hydrophobicity for n-octade-cylphosphonic acid (OPA) decorated PCN-222(Fe).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据