4.4 Article

Antiproliferative Activity of Green Synthesised Silver Nanoparticles of Cassia Marginata Roxb

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 195, 期 6, 页码 3807-3821

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-04188-w

关键词

Green synthesis; Silver nanoparticles; Anti-proliferative; Cassiamarginata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green synthesised silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been successfully biosynthesised using Cassia marginata Roxb leaf extract. The CM-AgNPs were confirmed by spectral studies and exhibited antioxidant and anticancer activities, showcasing their potential for the development of novel anticancer drugs.
Green synthesised silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been identified as a promising new therapy pathway for cancer because of their anti-angiogenic potency. In the present study, CM-AgNPs were biosynthesized using aqueous leaf extract of Cassia marginata Roxb (CM) and were confirmed by spectral studies like UV-Visible and attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopic techniques. The structure and shape of the biosynthesized CM-AgNPs were confirmed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) studies. The antioxidant activity of the synthesized nanoparticles were evaluated by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay methods, and the IC50 values were found to be 19.58 +/- 1.62 and 742.33 +/- 14.57 mu g, respectively. The anticancer activity of CM-AgNPs was evaluated against human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, and the IC50 values were found to be 21.02 +/- 1.67 and 26.21 +/- 0.33 mu g/ml, respectively. These results provide promising information about the biosynthesized CM-AgNPs that can be used in the development of novel anticancer drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据