4.7 Article

Uncovering microRNA-mediated response to SO2 stress in Arabidopsis thaliana by deep sequencing

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 178-185

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.014

关键词

Sulfur dioxide; Arabidopsis; MicroRNA; Target gene; Deep sequencing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470318, 30870454, 31371868]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20121401110007]
  3. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2009022]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Founded Project [2014M551056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a major air pollutant and has significant impacts on plants. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of gene expression regulators that play important roles in response to environmental stresses. In this study, deep sequencing was used for genome-wide identification of miRNAs and their expression profiles in response to SO2 stress in Arabidopsis thaliana shoots. A total of 27 conserved miRNAs and 5 novel miRNAs were found to be differentially expressed under SO2 stress. qRT-PCR analysis showed mostly negative correlation between miRNA accumulation and target gene mRNA abundance, suggesting regulatory roles of these miRNAs during SO2 exposure. The target genes of SO2-responsive miRNAs encode transcription factors and proteins that regulate auxin signaling and stress response, and the miRNAs-mediated suppression of these genes could improve plant resistance to SO2 stress. Promoter sequence analysis of genes encoding SO2-responsive miRNAs showed that stress-responsive and phytohormone-related cis-regulatory elements occurred frequently, providing additional evidence of the involvement of miRNAs in adaption to SO2 stress. This study represents a comprehensive expression profiling of SO2-responsive miRNAs in Arabidopsis and broads our perspective on the ubiquitous regulatory roles of miRNAs under stress conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据