4.5 Article

Pentagalloyl Glucose (PGG) Prevents and Restores Mechanical Changes Caused by Elastic Fiber Fragmentation in the Mouse Ascending Aorta

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 806-819

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-03093-x

关键词

Thoracic aortic aneurysm; Elastase; Elastin; Biomechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that pentagalloyl glucose (PGG) may be a pharmaceutical option to stabilize elastic fibers in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). The results suggest that PGG treatment can prevent and restore the mechanical and structural changes caused by elastic fiber degradation in TAA.
Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is characterized by dilation of the aorta that can lead to dissection or rupture. Degradation of elastic fibers is a consistent histopathological feature of TAA that likely contributes to disease progression. Pentagalloyl glucose (PGG) shows promise for stabilizing elastic fibers in abdominal aortic aneurysms, but its efficacy and mechanical effects in the thoracic aorta are unknown. We simulated TAAs using elastase (ELA) to degrade elastic fibers in the mouse ascending aorta and determined the preventative and restorative potential of PGG. Biaxial mechanical tests, constitutive model fitting, and multiphoton imaging were performed on untreated (UNT), PGG, ELA, PGG + ELA, and ELA + PGG treated aortas. PGG treatment alone does not significantly alter mechanical properties or wall structure compared to UNT. ELA treatment alone causes an increase in the unloaded diameter and length, decreased compliance, significant changes in the material constants, and separation of the outer layers of the aortic wall compared to UNT. PGG treatment before or after ELA ameliorates the mechanical and structural changes associated with elastic fiber degradation, with preventative PGG treatment being most effective. These results suggest that PGG is a potential pharmaceutical option to stabilize elastic fibers in TAA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据