4.6 Article

Genetic analysis of milk and milk composition traits in Murrah buffaloes using Bayesian inference

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2130797

关键词

Bayesian inference; Gibbs sampling; milk composition; Murrah; permanent environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the genetic parameters of milk and milk composition traits in Murrah buffaloes using data from 28 years. The results showed that all traits except for milk fat percentage had ample genetic variability that could be utilized for genetic improvement.
Accurate and unbiased assessment of genetic parameters of milk and milk composition traits play an important role in formulating breeding program for genetic improvement of Murrah buffaloes. In this study, data spread over 28 years were utilized to estimate genetic parameters of traits viz., 305 d milk yield (305MY), 305 d fat yield (305FY), 305 d solid not fat yield (305SNFY), milk fat percentage (fat%) and solid not fat percentage (SNF) percentage (SNF%) in Murrah buffaloes kept at ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal. Bayesian multiple-trait analysis was done using animal model and Gibbs sampling to estimate (co)variance components. Posterior means of heritability and posterior standard deviation for 305MY, 305FY, 305SNFY, fat% and SNF% were 0.18 +/- 0.05, 0.17 +/- 0.05, 0.18 +/- 0.05, 0.07 +/- 0.03 and 0.15 +/- 0.06 and posterior means of repeatability estimates along with posterior standard deviation for corresponding traits were 0.33 +/- 0.04, 0.32 +/- 0.04, 0.33 +/- 0.04, 0.14 +/- 0.02 and 0.30 +/- 0.04, respectively. Estimates of genetic correlation varied from -0.080 (305MY and fat %) to 0.999 (305MY and 305SNFY). Permanent environmental correlations varied from -0.060 (305MY and SNF%) to 0.999 (305FY and 305SNFY). This study indicated that all considered traits except fat% have ample genetic variability which can be exploited for selection and genetic improvement of Murrah buffaloes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据