4.6 Article

A novel splice variant of goat CPT1a gene and their diverse mRNA expression profiles

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2106573

关键词

Goat; CPT1a gene; alternative splicing; expression profiles; expression

资金

  1. Public Research Project of Fujian province [2020R10260014]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2022J01468]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed a novel splice transcript of the CPT1a gene in goats, which is predicted to result in the skipping of exons 6-19. The expression patterns of CPT1a and this novel splice variant, CPT1a-sv1, showed spatial differences and were involved in brain development. These findings provide insights into the function of the CPT1a gene and the molecular mechanism of alternative splicing in goats.
The Alternative splicing (AS) of Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a (CPT1a) and their expression profiles had never been illuminated in goats until now. Herein, a novel splice transcript in the CPT1a gene that is predicted to result in the skipping of exons 6-19 (CPT1a-sv1) has been isolated in addition to the full-length transcript in goats. The result of RT-PCR showed that CPT1a-sv1 is 606 bp in length and consists of 6 exons. A novel exon 6 was consisted of partial exon 5 and partial exon 19, compared to that in CPT1a. RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression patterns of CPT1a and CPT1a-sv1 are spatially different. In both kid and adult goats, the CPT1a transcript is strongly expressed in the liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and brain tissues. However, CPT1a-sv1 has a strong tissue-specific expression pattern, with moderate RNA levels in the liver and brain of kids, while highly expressed in the liver and minimally expressed in the brain of adults. We observed two transcripts to be involved in brain development. These findings improve our understanding of the function of the CPT1a gene in goats and provide information on the molecular mechanism of AS events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据