4.8 Review

Rationally Designing Efficient Electrocatalysts for Direct Seawater Splitting: Challenges, Achievements, and Promises

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202210753

关键词

Electrocatalysis; Hydrogen Evolution; Oxygen Evolution; Seawater Splitting; Water Dissociation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFA1600800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22072051, 22122202, 21972051]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2021CFB329]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515012343]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyXJJS003]
  6. University at Buffalo, the State University of New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Directly splitting seawater to produce hydrogen is an important pathway for energy and environmental sustainability, but faces various challenges that require the design of effective catalysts to overcome.
Directly splitting seawater to produce hydrogen provides a promising pathway for energy and environmental sustainability. However, current seawater splitting faces many challenges because of the sluggish kinetics, the presence of impurities, membrane contamination, and the competitive chloride oxidation reaction at the anode, which makes it more difficult than freshwater splitting. This Review firstly introduces the basic mechanisms of the anode and cathode reactions during seawater splitting. We critically analyze the primary principles for designing catalysts for seawater splitting in terms of both the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions, including with noble metal, noble metal free, and metal-free catalysts. Strategies to design effective catalysts, such as active site population, synergistic effect regulation, and surface engineering, are discussed. Furthermore, promises, perspectives, and challenges in developing seawater splitting technologies for clean hydrogen generation are summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据