4.7 Article

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation and microbial community shifts during co-composting of creosote-treated wood

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 17-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.023

关键词

Composting; Bioremediation; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Bioavailability; Microbial community

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0003]
  2. Competence Center of the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TE01020218]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [13-28283S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of decontaminating creosote-treated wood (CPA) by co-composting with agricultural wastes was investigated using two bulking agents, grass cuttings (GC) and broiler litter (BL), each employed at a 1:1 ratio with the matrix. The initial concentration of total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in CTW (26,500 mg kg(-1)) was reduced to 3 and 19% after 240 d in GC and BL compost, respectively. PAH degradation exceeded the predicted bioaccesible threshold, estimated through sequential supercritical CO2 extraction, together with significant detoxification, assessed by contact tests using Vibrio fisheri and Hordeum vulgare. GC composting was characterized by high microbial biomass growth in the early phases, as suggested by phospholipid fatty acid analyses. Based on the 454-pyrosequencing results, fungi (mostly Saccharomycetales) constituted an important portion of the microbial community, and bacteria were characterized by rapid shifts (from Firmicutes (Bacilli) and Actinobacteria to Proteobacteria). However, during BL composting, larger amounts of prokaryotic and eukaryotic PLFA markers were observed during the cooling and maturation phases, which were dominated by Proteobacteria and fungi belonging to the Ascomycota and those putatively related to the Glomeromycota. This work reports the first in-depth analysis of the chemical and microbiological processes that occur during the co-composting of a PAH-contaminated matrix. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据