4.8 Article

Deeper Understanding of Solvent-Based Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Are Molecular Profiles Primarily Dictated by Extraction Mechanisms?

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 42, 页码 14734-14744

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03360

关键词

-

资金

  1. Welch Foundation
  2. [F-1895-20190330]
  3. [F-1155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, solvent-based ambient ionization mass spectrometry techniques were used to investigate the extraction processes of lipids in biological tissues. The results suggest that the physicochemical properties of the solvent systems and the extraction time significantly influence the molecular extraction and detection of lipids.
Solvent-based ambient ionization mass spectrometry (MS) techniques provide a powerful approach for direct chemical analysis and molecular profiling of biological tissues. While molecular profiling of tissues has been widely used for disease diagnosis, little is understood about how the interplay among solvent properties, matrix effects, and ion suppression can influence the detection of biological molecules. Here, we perform a systematic investigation of the extraction processes of lipids using an ambient ionization droplet microsampling platform to investigate how the physicochemical properties of the solvent systems and extraction time influence molecular extraction and detection. Direct molecular profiling and quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) of discrete solvent droplets after surface sampling were investigated to provide insights into extraction and ionization mechanisms. The results of this study suggest that intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding play a major role in extraction and detection of lipids using solvent-based ambient ionization techniques. In addition, extraction time was observed to impact the molecular profiles obtained, suggesting optimization of this parameter can be performed to favor detection of specific analytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据