4.5 Article

Enhancing enzymatic activity of Mn@Co3O4 nanosheets as mimetic nanozyme for colorimetric assay of ascorbic acid

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 654, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114818

关键词

Mn dopedCo(3)O(4); Dual mimetic enzyme; Nanosheets; Ascorbic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed an efficient colorimetric method for the detection of H(2)O(2) and ascorbic acid using Mn-doped cobalt oxide nanosheets. The method demonstrated relatively low detection limits and wide linear ranges, along with good stability and selectivity for detecting ascorbic acid in real samples.
In nanozyme-based assays, increasing enzymatic activity is very desirable for enhancing sensitivity and lowering the detection limit. In this study, novel Mn doped cobalt oxide nanosheets (Mn@Co3O4 NSs) were synthesized by hydrothermal process. The obtained Mn@Co3O4 possessed enhanced dual-enzyme mimetic, oxidase and peroxidase, and can catalytically oxidize of 3, 3', 5, 5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), to a blue product of oxidized TMB. The enzyme kinetics were well-described mathematically using a common Michaelis-Menten and Line -weaver Burk model. The enzyme kinetics constant (Km) was found to be 0.15 mM, which is relatively low comparing with pure Co3O4 nanosheets (0.35 mM) and natural enzyme HRP (0.434 mM). Therefore, the efficient colorimetric method was achieved for determination of H(2)O(2 )and ascorbic acid. The limit of detection (LOD) of H2O2 was 8.0 mu M and the linear range was 20-200 mu M based on direct turn on of the peroxidase-like activity of Mn@Co3O4. While, for ascorbic acid detection based on turn-off approach, the linearity range for the ascorbic acid was 1-8 mu M with LOD of 0.4 mu M. Moreover, the colorimetric system exhibited good stability and selectivity toward the detection of ascorbic acid effectively in real samples (vitamin C tablets) with satisfactorily accuracy and precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据