4.4 Article

Annual Schedule Adjustment by a Long-Distance Migratory Bird

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/722566

关键词

annual cycle; carryover effects; domino effects; Numenius phaeopus; reversible state effects; temporal carryover effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matching the timing of annual cycle events with the required resources is crucial for individual fitness. Delays at any point in the sequence may negatively affect individual performance. This study on Icelandic whimbrels reveals that individuals use wintering sites to compensate for delays caused by successful breeding, and a domino effect impacts the breeding output. However, saving time during stationary periods helps avoid interannual effects between breeding seasons.
Matching the timing of annual cycle events with the required resources can have crucial consequences for individual fitness. But as the annual cycle is composed of sequential events, a delay at any point may be carried over to the subsequent stage (or more, in a domino effect) and negatively influence individual performance. To investigate how migratory animals navigate their annual schedule and where and when it may be adjusted, we used full annual cycle data on 38 Icelandic whimbrels (Numenius phaeopus islandicus) tracked over 7 years-a subspecies that typically performs long-distance migrations to West Africa. We found that individuals apparently used the wintering sites to compensate for delays that mostly arose as a result of previous successful breeding, and a domino effect was observed from spring departure to laying date, with the potential to affect breeding output. However, the total time saved during all stationary periods is apparently enough to avoid interannual effects between breeding seasons. These findings highlight the importance of preserving good-quality nonbreeding sites in which individuals may adjust annual schedules and avoid potentially adverse effects of arriving late at the breeding grounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据