4.4 Article

Estimating Density Dependence, Environmental Variance, and Long-Term Selection on a Stage-Structured Life History

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/723211

关键词

demography; density dependence; environmental variance; great tit; selection; sensitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for analyzing long-term demographic data is proposed to compare populations with different life histories. The method involves estimating the key parameters that determine the density dependence and environmental fluctuations in life history. The study also evaluates the long-term selection gradient on the life history.
A method for analyzing long-term demographic data on density-dependent stage-structured populations in a stochastic environment is derived to facilitate comparison of populations and species with different life histories. We assume that a weighted sum of stage abundances, N, exerts density dependence on stage-specific vital rates of survival and reproduction and that N has a small or moderate coefficient of variation. The dynamics of N are approximated as a univariate stochastic process governed by three key parameters: the density-independent growth rate, the net density dependence, and environmental variance in the life history. We show how to estimate the relative weighs of stages in N and the key parameters. Life history evolution represents a stochastic maximization of a simple function of the key parameters. The long-term selection gradient on the life history can be expressed as a vector of sensitivities of this function with respect to density-independent, density-dependent, and stochastic components of the vital rates. To illustrate the method, we analyze 38 years of demographic data on a great tit population, estimating the key parameters, which accurately predict the observed mean, coefficient of variation, and fluctuation rate of N; we also evaluate the long-term selection gradient on the life history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据