4.5 Review

Clinical Applications and Controversies of Whole-Body MRI: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 220, 期 4, 页码 463-475

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.22.28229

关键词

DWI; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; metastatic disease; multiple myeloma; pregnancy; whole-body MRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is increasingly being used for screening and staging of malignancies in high-risk individuals. It is also being explored as a technique for detecting metastatic disease in patients with visceral malignancies. WB-MRI has shown potential utility in evaluating disease extent and treatment response in non-oncologic conditions as well.
Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is increasing in clinical acceptance and utilization for a range of indications. WB-MRI is currently an established screening tool for children and adults at high risk of developing malignancy, with the strongest supporting evidence in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. WB-MRI has been added to professional society guidelines for staging disease in patients with certain malignancies including multiple myeloma and has been proposed as a technique to screen for metastatic disease in patients with visceral malignancies including prostate cancer and breast cancer. Emerging data support the utility of WB-MRI in children with malignancies such as Ewing sarcoma, in adults with myxoid liposarcoma, and in pregnant patients with occult or newly detected malignancy. WB-MRI can further help evaluate disease extent and treatment response in patients with nononcologic conditions such as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, myopathy, inflammatory arthritis, and fever of unknown origin. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review summarizes available evidence and recommendations supporting the clinical applications of WB-MRI. This article also highlights limitations, barriers, and controversies associated with utilization of WB-MRI in routine clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据