4.6 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Ophthalmology

Preventive treatment of allograft rejection after endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Florent Magnier et al.

Summary: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the efficacy of preventive treatment against allograft rejection after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) was evaluated. The results showed that Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) had a lower graft rejection rate compared to Descemet stripping (Automated) EK (DS(A)EK) or ultrathin (UT)-DSAEK. Soft steroids appeared to be a valuable alternative to standard steroids for preventing graft rejection after DMEK, with a lower risk of ocular hypertension. Further studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of other drugs in preventing graft rejection after EK.

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison

Josep Torras-Sanvicens et al.

Summary: UT-DSAEK and DMEK showed similar objective and subjective visual quality results, with DMEK demonstrating faster recovery, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and more anatomical posterior keratometry compared to UT-DSAEK in this paired-eye study.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Ophthalmology

Recovery of Contrast Sensitivity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Enken Gundlach et al.

Summary: Patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and bullous keratopathy have impaired contrast sensitivities, while DMEK surgery significantly improves contrast sensitivity. Preoperative corneal thickness correlates with preoperative contrast sensitivity, and postoperative anterior corneal aberrations correlate with postoperative contrast sensitivity.

CORNEA (2021)

Article Ophthalmology

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complicated Vitrectomized Eyes

Michael Mimouni et al.

Summary: The study compared outcomes of DMEK and DSAEK in complex eyes undergoing vitrectomy. DMEK had a higher proportion of Fuchs' patients and higher rates of serious adverse events postoperatively compared to DSAEK.

CURRENT EYE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparative Analysis of Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging between DMEK and UT-DSAEK Eyes

Anna Machalinska et al.

Summary: UT-DSAEK appears to be a simpler and safer technique than DMEK, with similar outcomes in terms of irregular astigmatism and total keratometry values. Differences in endothelial cell count and decreases in posterior mean keratometry were observed between the two procedures, but there were no significant variations in other corneal parameters.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Review Ophthalmology

DSAEK or DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Jie Wu et al.

Summary: This review of studies on indications and outcomes of DSAEK/DSEK and DMEK for failed penetrating keratoplasty showed that endothelial keratoplasty led to improved vision and graft clarity in recipients. While graft survival and rejection rates were similar between the two groups, DMEK-PK patients generally had better visual outcomes with higher detachment rates.

INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY (2021)

Article Ophthalmology

Microthin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Artemis Matsou et al.

Summary: The study compared the outcomes of MT-DSAEK and DMEK surgeries for Fuchs dystrophy. Results showed that DMEK surgery led to significantly better BSCVA at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, with similar complication rates and vision-related QoL scores between the two groups.

CORNEA (2021)

Article Ophthalmology

Impact of Re-bubbling after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty on Long-term Results

Enken Gundlach et al.

Summary: This study found that re-bubbling increased the risk of endothelial cell loss, but did not influence postoperative visual acuity and the rate of graft failure.

CURRENT EYE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Ophthalmology

Clinical outcomes of pre-loaded ultra-thin DSAEK and pre-loaded DMEK

Vito Romano et al.

BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY (2020)

Article Ophthalmology

DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis

Raquel Esteves Marques et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2019)

Review Ophthalmology

Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Massimo Busin et al.

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY (2014)

Article Ophthalmology

Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five-year follow-up

Matthew T. Feng et al.

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY (2014)

Article Ophthalmology

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Theofilos Tourtas et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2012)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: the first 15 years (1993-2008)

R. Harbour et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH (2011)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)

Article Ophthalmology

Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure

Marco Lombardo et al.

GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY (2010)

Article Ophthalmology

Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Gerrit R. J. Melles et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2008)