4.6 Editorial Material

Missing Outcome Data in Epidemiologic Studies

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 192, 期 1, 页码 6-10

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac179

关键词

bias; error; generalized computation; imputation; missing data; precision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Missing data is a common and significant problem in epidemiology, leading to decreased precision and notable bias. There are currently too few simple examples illustrating the types of missing data and their impact on results, and ignoring missing data remains a standard approach in epidemiology.
Missing data are pandemic and a central problem for epidemiology. Missing data reduce precision and can cause notable bias. There remain too few simple published examples detailing types of missing data and illustrating their possible impact on results. Here we take an example randomized trial that was not subject to missing data and induce missing data to illustrate 4 scenarios in which outcomes are 1) missing completely at random, 2) missing at random with positivity, 3) missing at random without positivity, and 4) missing not at random. We demonstrate that accounting for missing data is generally a better strategy than ignoring missing data, which unfortunately remains a standard approach in epidemiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据