4.7 Article

Gas-solid separation performance and structure optimization in 3D printed guide vane cyclone separator

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2022.103815

关键词

Cyclone separator; Gas-solid separation; Separation efficiency; Structure optimization; CFD

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
  2. research and innovation fund for graduate students of southwest petroleum university [2020CXZD03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a 3D printed guide vane cyclone separator was designed to investigate the separation efficiency, turbulent kinetic energy, and particle movement. The results revealed that the tangential velocity played a major role in the separation process, and the bottom of the exhaust pipe was the main region for gas-solid separation and pressure drop. The separation efficiency and pressure drop were positively correlated with the inlet velocity and the particle radius of the fluid.
Low separation efficiency and large pressure drop are two common problems of cyclones. In this paper, a 3D printed guide vane cyclone separator was designed to study the separation efficiency, turbulent kinetic energy, and particle movement of particle group by experiment and simulation. The results shown that the tangential velocity was the major influence of separating. The bottom of the exhaust pipe was the main region of gas-solid separation and pressure drop. The separation efficiency and pressure drop were positively correlated with the inlet velocity and the particle radius of the fluid. The distribution of turbu-lent kinetic energy that leaded to the pressure drop loss was concentrated on the inlet of the exhaust pipe. The swirl has external and internal two directions. The optimized cyclone has a longer and narrower blade flow path to obtain higher separation efficiency, especially at low inlet velocity. (c) 2022 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据