4.7 Article

The influence of helium and heavy ion irradiations on radiation responses of single crystal Cu with nanovoids: An in situ TEM study

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118293

关键词

In situ TEM; Heavy ion irradiation; Helium effect; Void shrinkage; Critical Bubble Model

资金

  1. U.S. Office of Navel Research [NSF-CMMI-1728419]
  2. NSF- DMR-Metallic Materials and Nanostructures Program [NSF-CMMI-1728419, N0 0 014-22-1-2160]
  3. DOE, Office of Nuclear Energy [N0 0 014-20-1-2043]
  4. [1611380]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of helium has a significant impact on the evolution of voids under high-temperature radiation, as it can stabilize the nanovoids and prevent them from shrinking.
Helium is a common nuclear reaction product, and it plays an important role in radiation-induced void swelling. Although extensive studies have been conducted to investigate the helium effects in metals and alloys, most of them were based on the post-irradiation analyses or computer simulations. Conclusive evidence that can demonstrate how voids evolve in the presence of He under high-temperature radiation remains limited. In this work, we performed in situ heavy ion radiation studies in a transmission electron microscope to compare the radiation response of the preexisting nanovoids in single crystal copper sub-jected to a single beam of 1 MeV Kr ions and a sequential dual beam of 14 keV He ion and 1 MeV Kr ion at 350 degrees C. Our studies revealed that the nanovoids would contract continuously until being eliminated when irradiated by a single beam of Kr ions. In comparison, the nanovoids in helium-injected Cu could reach a stable state and eventually stopped shrinking. Moreover, the influence of helium on the kinetics of void/bubble evolution under heavy ion irradiation was discussed within the framework of a proposed critical bubble model and bubble coarsening model.(c) 2022 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据