4.6 Article

Towards Media Inter-cloud Standardization - Evaluating Impact of Cloud Storage Heterogeneity

期刊

JOURNAL OF GRID COMPUTING
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 425-443

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10723-015-9356-5

关键词

Media cloud; Inter-cloud computing; Cloud federation; Cloud storage

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2013R1A1A2013620]
  2. MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning), Korea, under ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program [IITP-2015-(H8501-15-1015)]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20131612192] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital media has been increasing very rapidly, resulting in cloud computing's popularity gain. Cloud computing provides ease of management of large amount of data and resources. With a lot of devices communicating over the Internet and with the rapidly increasing user demands, solitary clouds have to communicate to other clouds to fulfill the demands and discover services elsewhere. This scenario is called inter-cloud computing or cloud federation. Inter-cloud computing still lacks standard architecture. Prior works discuss some of the architectural blue-prints, but none of them highlight the key issues involved and their impact, so that a valid and reliable architecture could be envisioned. In this paper, we discuss the importance of inter-cloud computing and present in detail its architectural components. Inter-cloud computing also involves some issues. We discuss key issues as well and present impact of storage heterogeneity. We have evaluated some of the most noteworthy cloud storage services, namely: Dropbox, Amazon CloudDrive, GoogleDrive, Microsoft OneDrive (formerly SkyDrive), Box, and SugarSync in terms of Quality of Experience (QoE), Quality of Service (QoS), and storage space efficiency. Discussion on the results shows the acceptability level of these storage services and the shortcomings in their design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据