4.8 Article

A Cell Space Station for Spatiotemporal Molecular Manipulation of Immune Checkpoint

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 16332-16342

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c05483

关键词

molecular manipulation; click chemistry; PD-L1 degradation; immune checkpoint blockade; cancer immunotherapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation
  3. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
  4. [22074006]
  5. [2222029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a click chemistry-driven protein sorting strategy that achieves spatial and temporal manipulation of specific proteins along the PD-1 immune checkpoint axis. The strategy shows promising results in tumor-immune therapy both in vitro and in vivo.
Spatiotemporal manipulation of protein distributions, abundances, and functions based on molecular level remains a significant challenge in studying biological systems and developing therapeutics. Particularly, such a nanotherapeutic platform though both specific and internal way is extremely lacking. Herein, we put forward a click chemistry-driven protein sorting (PROCLISORT) strategy, which acted in a cell space station (CSS) to achieve the sequential regulation of specific protein along the entire PD-1 immune checkpoint axis. From the spatial dimension, CSS could achieve comprehensive recognition, anchoring and blocking PD-L1/PD-L2 as well as transport PD-L1 among organelles at the subcellular level. From the time dimension, through the booting control via click reaction, the occurrence of these biological regulatory events became controllable and sequential, thus resulting in rapid and durable down-regulation of PD-L1. Through these smart tasks, this CSS stimulated a satisfactory tumor-immune-therapy effect both in vitro and in vivo. With a rational design, this multistage booting nanoplatform holds promise for molecular manipulation along the disease-related pathway in various living systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据