4.8 Article

One-Pot Hierarchical Structuring of Nanocellulose by Electrophoretic Deposition

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 18390-18397

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c06392

关键词

nanocellulose; hydrogel; hierarchical structure; biomimicry; electrophoretic deposition; orientation control

资金

  1. JST ACT-X
  2. [19J202410]
  3. [JPMJAX21K3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a simple and flexible strategy for constructing sophisticated hierarchical structures using electrophoretic and electrochemical deposition. By adjusting the applied voltage, cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) are oriented and deposited on an anode, forming anisotropic mechanical properties and complex hierarchical structures. This technique is expected to be applicable to various materials and contribute to fields such as biomimicry, functional nanomaterials, and sustainable and functional moldings.
The orientation control and the formation of hierarchical structures of nanoscale components, such as bionanofibers and nanosheets, have attracted considerable research interest with the aim of achieving sophisticated functional materials. Herein, we report a simple and flexible strategy for constructing sophisticated hierarchical structures through electrophoretic and electrochemical deposition. Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), which are used as model materials, are deposited on an anode in an aqueous dispersion and seamlessly oriented from horizontal to vertical relatively to the electrode by adjusting the applied voltage between the electrodes. The oriented CNF hydrogels not only exhibit anisotropic mechanical properties but also form complex orientations and hierarchical structures, such as cartilage-and plant stem-like configurations in response to electrode shape and applied voltage. This simple and flexible technique is expected to be applicable to various materials and contribute to a wide range of fields that include biomimicry, functional nanomaterials, and sustainable and functional moldings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据