4.8 Article

Nanoporous Atomically Thin Graphene Filters for Nanoscale Aerosols

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 14, 期 36, 页码 41328-41336

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c10827

关键词

filtering nanoscale aerosols; graphene membranes; virus filtration; nanoporous atomically thin membranes; personal protective equipment; nanopores

资金

  1. Intellectual Ventures
  2. NSF
  3. Vanderbilt University [1944134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Filtering nanoparticulate aerosols from air streams is crucial for various personal protection equipment (PPE). The existing PPEs are bulky and sacrifice breathability. However, a new study has shown that introducing nanopores into graphene can enable effective filtration of sub-20 nm nanoparticles while maintaining good air permeability. This research has important implications for bio/virus threat mitigation.
Filtering nanoparticulate aerosols from air streams is important for a wide range of personal protection equipment (PPE), including masks used for medical research, healthcare, law enforcement, first responders, and military applications. Conventional PPEs capable of filtering nanoparticles < 300 nm are typically bulky and sacrifice breathability to maximize protection from exposure to harmful nanoparticulate aerosols including viruses -20-300 nm from air streams. Here, we show that nanopores introduced into centimeter-scale monolayer graphene supported on polycarbonate track-etched supports via a facile oxygen plasma etch can allow for filtration of aerosolized SiO2 nanoparticles of -5-20 nm from air steams while maintaining air permeance of -2.28-7.1 x 10(-5) mol m(-2 )s-1 Pa-1. Furthermore, a systematic increase in oxygen plasma etch time allows for a tunable size-selective filtration of aerosolized nanoparticles. We demonstrate a new route to realize ultra-compact, lightweight, and conformal form-factor filters capable of blocking sub-20 nm aerosolized nanoparticles with particular relevance for biological/viral threat mitigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据